This is not polemic, as some of the mid-2000's books on atheism are God Delusion, God is Not Great, etc , but a sophisticated and rigorous work. First, atheists whom Kitcher wants to persuade to develop a positive view of secular humanism. Secondly, I wish he had addressed more strongly the fact that the source of values is separate from the legitimation of values. However, he knows that for the believers, no amount of rational argument would persuade them to abandon the idea that after this finite life, there is a better, infinite one. It is a book well worth reading if you have any interest in these issue This book has good insight, but it is needlessly philosophical in parts, in that the author takes too long to develop his point or arguments.
This is a pragmatic view of incrementally improving ethical practice based on some degree of egalitarianism. It took me a little time to adjust to Kitcher's writing style, which I found dense and academic in places, but after adjusting to it I found him to have sure hand in guiding the reader through his arguments. Thanks to Philip Kitcher the level of debate is improving. Not literally but after 60 unenjoyable pages I don't see any points that haven't been made before and better made. There are other writers who could do a better job on these same subjects. It provokes and requires a lot of thinking on the part of the reader.
This book has good insight, but it is needlessly philosophical in parts, in that the author takes too long to develop his point or arguments. Parts of it are a little heavy on philosophical reflection and it isn't really what I thought it would be. This is analogous to Popper's distinction between the context of discovery and the context of justification. Those without a background in the work of Hume, Kant, and others may momentarily feel lost. This enlightening book fills the gap. Get hundred collections of book link todownload and get always updated book every day.
It's as if the guy delights in paining his readers with 35 word sentences. He investigates how secular lives compare with those of people who adopt religious doctrines as literal truth, as well as those who embrace less literalistic versions of religion. By employing cases from literature, mathematics, and other fields, readers can easily identify examples that connect with their backgrounds and philosophies. With clarity and deep insight, Kitcher reveals the power of secular humanism to encourage fulfilling human lives built on ethical truth. Through these lectures Kitcher argues that secular humanism has responses to religionists' typical challenges to atheism on the questions of ethics, morality, values, meaning of life, death and the afterlife, and whether humans are naturally inclined toward good or evil. Immediate download and read free of charge How to Read a Book book by clicking the link above. However, unlike in the case of chapter 2, no defense at least none that was apparent to me is given for why this is necessarily the proper secular definition for this notion.
The presumption is always that religious people have more fulfilling lives. It is, instead, a sober and soulful book, an exemplary practice of philosophical reflection. In either case, evidence becomes irrelevant, all faith positions become epistemologically equivalent, and you must appeal to a non-faith based criterion to adjudicate between them. For those readers just beginning to let go of their religion, this book may be very useful in helping them make the transition to a meaningful life without religion. This is a short little book of only 160 pages of text.
The beliefs are highly questionable but it is indisputable that religion is useful to human beings. It doesn't seem helpful to me. Whereas religious belief has been important in past times, Kitcher concludes that evolution away from religion is now essential. It it fails criticism then, then we know our critique has been devastating, rather than a jab at a straw man. Do you need to download Life After Faith: The Case for Secular Humanism The Terry Lectures Series book? It took me a little time to adjust to Kitcher's writing style, which I found dense and academic in places, but after adjusting to it I found him to have sure hand in guiding the reader through his arguments. This enlightening book fills the gap.
Contents: Doubt delineated -- Values vindicated -- Religion refined -- Mortality and meaning -- Depth and depravity. The book was adapted from a series of public lectures that Kitcher gave a few years ago, and should be mostly accessible to people without a formal background in philosophy. What Kitcher does is argue against the extremes in his own camp as unhelpful in bringing legitimacy to the cause of secular humanism. This is the website that will give you ease of searching book to read. It is, instead, a sober and soulful book, an exemplary practice of philosophical reflection. Thanks to Philip Kitcher the level of debate is improving. That said, if you're looking for a more intelligent and sophisticated discussion of the reasons for rejecting religion, the nature of religion's role in our cognitive life, and what a truly secular society might look like, you will enjoy this book.
He deals explicitly and quite well with 2 of the major issues that religion is supposed to overcome - human mortality and human evil. Kitcher is promoting the case for secular humanism which he says begins with doubt. The points were still made in this book, although they were buried underneath dense language. Kitcher lays out a reasonable position for a non-dogmatic atheism. A professor of philosophy, Kitcher uses his knowledge of both religion and secularism to address an imagined critic. Even still, it is most definitely more difficult and dense than the more popular books on this topic that have come out in the last few years. He investigates how secular lives compare with those of people who adopt religious doctrines as literal truth, as well as those who embrace less literalistic versions of religion.